Crude Awakening
Topic: Energy|
Oil prices have put energy front and center on the world’s stage. As record prices continue week after week, day after day the confrontation with an energy present and future are on the minds and mouths of many. 
In Europe oil protests erupted this week. Truckers in London blocked a major artery into the capital on Tuesday. They are putting pressure on PM Gordon Brown to act. Diesel runs at more than $9.00 a gallon there and unleaded gas costs $8.61. The British impose a $3.77 a gallon fuel duty and a 17.5% on top of that. This policy was intended to increase the use of pubic transportation. Many in England these days are questioning the taxes in the wake of surging gas prices.
In France, farmers and fishermen have been protesting for two weeks. They have blocked access to fuel refineries in several locations to display their anger at rising oil prices.
Countries on the edge of poverty such as Mongolia face crippling decisions. People in the harsh climate there are facing decisions between starving or staying warm. As food prices and energy costs run along parallel lines, these decisions aren’t always an either or proposition. In Indonesia rising oil prices have caused riots forcing the government there to subsidize energy costs to prevent an economic collapse.
Since we are dealing with an international crisis there is very little a single nation can do, especially those in the Third World.
Interestingly (and economically viable) the major Western nations are seeing a reduction of demand as oil prices are causing a shift in energy habits. China however has chosen to heavily subsidize fuel prices until after the Olympics, resulting in steady fuel prices there. A billion disgruntled Chinese wouldn’t be a pretty picture for the world’s cameras, especially in combination with the aftermath of the earthquake that hit Sichuan earlier this month.
The price is rising at a much greater clip than normal supply and demand would warrant. OPEC in fact says that the rise is due in large part to oil speculators. OPEC claims there is plenty of oil but they are nearing capacity. Investors claim the surge in speculator activity is attributable to the decline in other sectors such as real estate. The speculators are merely looking for more profitable investments. Without the recent speculation gas would be closer to $50 or $60 a barrel as opposed to $130 a barrel as it sits today.
Whereas the 2004 US presidential election centered on the Iraq War and security, the 2008 version may well pivot on energy costs. $5.00 gas is on the horizon and many are frightened of the prospect this summer. And as we know fear is a powerful political tool.


May 29th, 2008 at 9:39 pm
I think it is ironic that a liberal would be complaining about high oil prices. The policies of the Democrats call for high oil prices. Why are we not drilling in Alaska or off the coast of Florida? There is some speculation that we have 10 billion barrels of oil available to be pumped. Why isn’t there an outcry to get the Democratic led congress to start drilling? They rejected the drilling 10 years ago for one reason. I guess Al Gore’s enviromental agenda does not mean cheaper prices for us. At least he is making millions and living a comfortable life.
May 30th, 2008 at 10:06 am
I don’t think you are in tune with the issue at hand. As you read in my blog the issue is not supply. The challenge is not to produce more oil. This is how the oil companies (and large swaths of the conservatives) want you to approach this issue. It should not surprise you that a liberal wants to see a change in how things are viewed. The policy should not be to open up Anwr or the Caribbean shelf. In this way the spike in oil prices will fit right into the hands of the oil companies and not change the dynamics. It is now time to alter the way we consume energy and use the one great skill Americans are known for, ingenuity, to turn our backs on an oil policy that has been self-destructive. If you want to continue to see the world through the eyes of people like Glenn Beck then you will be part of the problem, not part of the solution. As for Al Gore, who cares about him. I’m not talking about global warming, I’m talking about national security and economic viability.
June 2nd, 2008 at 9:50 pm
Obviously we need to change our energy policy. We all need to learn conservation and responsibility. However everytime a nuclear plant is proposed to be built, the process is stopped by the environmentalist. Why would they stop one of the cheapest cleanest forms of energy? We have not built a new Nuclear power plant since the early 1970s since the enviromentalist movement. What a coincindence that some liberal causes us to pay higher prices by stopping progress. If we are going to put limits on outputs of emissions then we will all pay a higher price for everything.