Archive for the 'Economics' Category

House of Cards

Topic: Economics| 8 Comments »

For the past several years there was always the looming question, “How can people afford all these large houses that are going up everywhere?” The answer always were in the form of a shrug of the shoulders. Now we are finding out the real answer. They couldn’t afford these houses.signs-755526

When I moved into my current home, the house to my south was owned by a napoleonic fireman and his wife who were very good homeowners. He didn’t care much for living here but was required by his job to live in the city limits. So he found a lot on the fringe of the city and staked his claim. About five years ago he retired and moved away. The next owner was a thirty-something with a wild streak and a girl friend in tow. She apparently didn’t care all that much for his wild streak and left him. It wasn’t long after that he foreclosed on his home and the home lay dormant. Last summer a house speculator, obviously inspired by all those flipping houses shows, bought up the property and put it on the market hoping to make a quick buck. But unfortunately the housing collapse emerged in the middle of his gambit. The house never sold. He brought in contractors to try to inspire buyers but the buyers weren’t inspired. The for-sale-by-owner sign was replaced by a realtor sign which was replaced by a renter sign. A couple weeks ago three twenty-somethings moved in. We know when they are returning from jobs by the boom booms emitting from vehicles. The housing crisis has come home to roost on the edge of my lawn.

Economists say so much can be discerned by the number of new housing starts. These indicators are linked to such things as employment, to retail sales, to the success of large box home improvement chains. The current mortgage disaster is a foreteller of bad things on all counts. The job of government is to protect homeowners from such practices as predatory lending and they have failed dismally. The impact this will have on the future of the US economy may stretch beyond just an ordinary cyclical recession. The unintended consequences of the government not intervening in bad economic policy will be just one more legacy of the Bush Administration. Now I’m forced to live with idiots next door and idiots in the White House.

The Next Slum

It’s the Economy…

Topic: Economics, Politics| No Comments »

Anyone who watched the Dems debate tonight will quickly understand why it is difficult becoming the president from Congress. Defending votes in the legislative branch is like grabbing and holding sand. You can make a hundred great votes but it is that one you regret that gets you. The sharp exchanges by Hillary and Barack were entertaining and I for one liked to see them. The depth of the dialogue is more detailed than you see in the Republican debates. The one issue where the Democrats are wrong is Iraq. They are not capable of altering their position with what is transpiring on the ground. Granted, Iraq is a difficult issue because George Bush has made it so. The course of the war has taken turns that are unpredictable because Iraq has proven inconsistent. Pulling troops out now would be folly. If the situation takes a turn toward chaos then it will be time to leave but it is time to make hay as the sun shines, as they say; and the Democratic candidates need to be pragmatic. Pragmatism is a liberal virtue and they should not shy away from that strength now. When they debated Iraq tonight their stances seemed dated.

stock market

Another aspect of the debate this evening was how much this election season is so much unlike the 2004 campaign. Most people coming into this election believed it would be Iraq that would frame the race. This campaign will be about the economy. As I write this we have seen foreign markets lose between 5% and 7% of their value in a single day of trading (a seven percent drop in our stock market would be about 900 points). When the markets open tomorrow there could be dramatic sell-offs. Most experts believe that we have been in recession since December. Whereas the 04 election was a referendum on Iraq this election will be about the economy and I don’t believe it is one the Republicans can win. If McCain captures the GOP nomination where will his acumen to resolve financial matters come from. In fact most Republicans want to keep the debate in the realm of national security. The Republicans on national security, like the Democrats on Iraq, haven’t moved with the times. So as the day progresses tomorrow and we watch as the stock market reacts, we will see if the candidates campaigns move with it or continue to talk as if the topics of yesterday are still the most important issues. Many have talked about change. Well, we will see if they are in fact “change” candidates.

Down Will Soon Be Up

Topic: Economics, Geography, Health| No Comments »

When I was a kid if we didn’t eat all the food on our plate our parents would say, “Don’t you know there are people in China that are starving.” That doesn’t apply much anymore.

How much do you think you know about the world? On this Christmas Eve I’m going to start out with a quiz. For each pair tell which nation has the highest infant mortality rate.

Sri Lanka or Turkey

Poland or South Korea

Malaysia or Russia

Pakistan or Vietnam

Thailand or South Africa

Professor Hans Roslings will give you the answers in a fascinating speech about the changes occurring in the developing world. It is about 20 minutes long and divides the Third World into winners and losers. It culminates in a graph that compares the US and China and tells us what we know is transpiring, except in graph form it seems more menacing.

Check, Please

Topic: Economics, Politics| No Comments »

When I teach I often tell my students how national, even international, situations often mirror what occurs with the individual. No clearer case can be made than with the debt. The national debt roared past $9 trillion and the runaway spending continues without check. In essence, the federal government is using its credit card. The sad reality is Americans are choosing to spend like the government is spending, by pulling out the plastic. For the first time since the Great Depression, Americans have a negative savings rate. Credit card debt averages about $10,000 per household today.

debt graph

 

              (Click the graph to see a larger image)

 

 

The federal government continues to struggle with spending. As I mentioned in a prior entry, the debate over the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) reveals many in Congress would choose to continue the tax cuts and not require there to be offsets for them. There is also the illusion that the wars overseas are necessary and thus do not need to be balanced with taxes. Just like with those who took out adjustable mortgages in the last  half decade, when interest rates are low the debt is manageable but once interest rates rise the result is catastrophic. Such is the case with the national debt. If interest rates rise the amount the government is required to pay rises with it. Making this even more troublesome is the fact that many of our creditors reside overseas and possess forms of government that our current president would rather overthrow than borrow from (if the Neo-con playbook were in force everywhere). Combine all this bad news with the crisis looming over entitlement programs such as medicare, medicaid and social security and it does make for a nasty fiscal cocktail.

The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are extremely costly. If security is required in the next ten years there, the price tag will continue to burden this country. The Christian Science Monitor reports, “The CBO (Congressional Budget Office) estimates that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan could cost $2.4 trillion over the next decade. Nearly $700 billion of that cost will be interest on the debt to finance the wars.” 

Since taking control of Congress, the Democrats are trying to get Republicans to utilize what is known as PayGo, or Pay-as-you-go, on such issues as the AMT relief and the war but the GOP, usually the party of fiscal responsibility, is running away from their mantra for either reasons of political expediency or to endear themselves to corporate sponsors.

These are issues our nation faces as the election nears. It is time for us to get our fiscal situation in order, whether it be personal or national.

Off-Shore Cruise on the Canard Line

Topic: Economics, Politics| 1 Comment »

Nothing reveals the nature of the Republican Party more than the battle going on in Congress. It involves a pesky little tax called the alternative minimum tax (AMT) and the desire to eliminate it. The AMT was introduced in 1970 to ensure that upper income tax payers paid a fair share since many at that time paid no tax at all. The flaw in the tax was it was not adjusted for inflation and now many middle income taxpayers are now forced to pay the AMT along with their ordinary taxes. The AMT applies to most married couples who make between $100,000 and $500,000 with more than half of the revenue generated from the tax being paid by those making over $200,000. All US Congressmen recognize the AMT needs to be done away with but there is a serious problem in doing so. TaxTimeTorture In repealing the tax the government will lose between $800 billion and $1.5 trillion over the next 10 years. That is a heavy hit for a nation that is already $9 trillion in debt. Charley Rangel, a Democratic Representative from New York, has introduced a bill that would do away with the AMT and offset the loss in revenue by eliminating a tax loophole utilized for some time by the uber-wealthy and corporations. This loophole prevents hedge fund managers and other individuals from using offshore tax haven corporations to defer taxes on compensation received for providing investment services. In other words, these entities move money to locations like the Cayman Islands in order to avoid paying their fair share of taxes. Using offshore tax havens is illegal but rarely enforced. The bill entitled H.R. 4351, the AMT Relief Act of 2007 passed the House of Representatives 226 to 193, almost entirely along party lines. It now goes to the Senate where the bill will be hotly contested where the Democrats hold a razor slim majority.

The question you have to ask is why the Republicans are battling the changing of the tax code (offshore tax shelters) when the practice is illegal in order to do away with a tax imposed on upper-middle class Americans? In fact the President, who is threatening to veto the bill is calling the elimination of the shelter a “tax hike”.

“The administration does not believe the appropriate way to protect 21 million additional taxpayers from 2007 AMT liability is to impose a tax increase on other taxpayers,” said the White House today.

First off, I think everyone reading this or knowledgeable about the bill should write their congressmen and let them know they are aware of what is going on. Secondly, when you go vote in November, remember for whom the Republican Party represents. I am amazed as I pass small homes with Republican yard signs or drive by rugged pick up trucks with Republican bumper stickers on them the utter ignorance of their choice of candidates.  Isn’t it obvious the GOP has never had their interest at heart? The current battle going on in Congress is testament to the true character and loyalty of the Republican party.

Related article:

House Votes Minimum Tax Cut, Closes Fund Loophole

House Passes Responsible AMT Relief-Measure Moves to Senate

V e i l e d M a r k e t: The Rape Charge

Topic: Economics, Middle East| 2 Comments »

 SaudiCitiWomen

Posted by JadedSage

The courts in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia recently sentenced a rape victim to six months in jail and 200 lashes. Known as the Girl of Qatif, she was retrieving a picture of herself from a high school friend in a car when two men joined the girls in the car and drove them to a secluded location where five other men were waiting. She and her friend were raped by the men. The incident took place in 2006 when she was 19 and newly married.

The case went before the cleric run court in Saudi Arabia defined by the ultra-conservative Wahhabi sect of Islam. Saudi law forbids women to be in the presence of men who are not related to them. Saudi courts have no written law code and thus are open to interpretation. The arbitrary ruling by the judges was swift and harsh. The lawyer for the Girl of Qatif went public and the courts raised her sentence from 60  to 200 lashes. The boys also were sentenced in the case. President Bush, who has a strong familial relationship with the Saudi Royal family, finally denounced the ruling publicly but has been reluctant to confront the ruling family directly.

The Wahhabi clerics and the family of Saud share power in the Kingdom. Since its founding in 1932 there has been a balancing act between the religious influence of the Wahhabi sect and the political might of the House of Saud. Criticism throughout the world has come down on Saudi Arabia in the wake of the case. The King is slow to take a stand since the court lies outside the royal family’s jurisdiction. There is no doubt, however, that the verdict has hurt the image of the Kingdom; an image that has taken many hits since 2001. Most of the terrorists that struck the US on 9-11 came from Saudi Arabia and Osama bin Laden’s father, who made a fortune in the construction business was one of the country’s favorite sons. Furthermore, the nation uses its vast oil wealth to spread its virulent form of Islam throughout the world in the form of religious schools known as madrassas (after the arabic word for schools).

In a bubble, the rape case would be just another case of injustice but domestic American economic forces have merged the wealth of Saudi Arabia with a top bank in the US. Recently Citibank, has been taking significant losses in the subprime mortgage debacle to the tune of $17 billion and the bank could lose as much as $65 billion before the housing loan issue blows over.  Due to rising oil prices many cash rich Arabs are putting down stakes in corporate America. Citigroup, the parent company of Citibank, sold 4.9% of its interest to Abu Dhabi to soften the blow of the subprime mortgage crisis. Prince al-Waleed bin Talal of the aforementioned  Saudi Royal Family also owns about 5% of Citigroup.

Due to our free enterprise system we have the ability to make it known to institutions such as Citibank that we are not happy that now our borrowing practices are funding princes in Saudi Arabia who allow judicial verdicts such as the Girl of Qatif case or ultimately the spreading of Wahhabism throughout the world. We may not be able to influence Saudi Arabia directly but we can make it known to US companies like Citibank we don’t appreciate their economic alliance.

The Decline of the Dollar

Topic: Economics| No Comments »

currencies

Posted by JadedSage

Whispers of recession in the US abound these days. The housing bubble has burst with housing prices falling for both new and existing homes. Combine this with fuel prices and a rising national debt and you are seeing a  decline in the US dollar. Some are saying the dollar will cease to be the monster of the currency trade that it has enjoyed for most of the post-WW II period. The Euro seems to have found some traction and the Chinese Yuan is also getting some attention. The Yuan’s influence still seems to be in the future and the Euro also faces some challenges as a favored world currency. All indicators suggest that the near term picture for the US economy does not look rosy. 

Losing faith in the greenback

Nov 29th 2007
From The Economist print edition

Riser

THE long-run value of all paper currencies is zero. That is a fond saying of Bill Bonner, goldbug and publisher of the Daily Reckoning, a contrarian financial newsletter. So why should the dollar be any different? Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran’s president, seems to think the long run is now: two weeks ago he decried the dollar as a “worthless piece of paper”. And Jim Rogers, a famously shrewd investor, asks why anyone would buy dollars.

America’s currency has been infected by the sense of crisis that bedevils its economy and financial markets. Speculative selling of the dollar is close to an all-time high, reckons Stephen Jen at Morgan Stanley. Many believe—and some evidently hope—that the greenback might be on its way out as an international currency. Worrying parallels are seen between the dollar’s recent fall and the decline of sterling as a reserve currency half a century ago.

The dollar’s value against the basket of leading currencies tracked by America’s Federal Reserve has recently been at an all-time low. Against a broader range of currencies, the dollar has lost a quarter of its value in the past five years. Its decline has been especially marked against the euro. At one point in 2002 the euro was worth 86 cents; today it buys $1.48.

That currencies rise and fall and test records is hardly unusual. What lends the dollar’s decline an air of crisis is that the world’s bloated currency reserves are crammed with depreciating dollar assets. Foreign-exchange stockpiles have almost tripled to $5.7 trillion since the beginning of the decade. China alone has $1.4 trillion of reserves. Japan’s $1 trillion or so make it the second-largest holder.

In this period of swelling reserves, the dollar has retained its pre-eminence. It still accounts for nearly 65% of identifiable currency-stockpiles, according to the latest IMF data. This is broadly in line with its historical share (see chart). Factor in the dollars hoarded by China and Middle Eastern oil exporters (not included in the IMF breakdown) and the dollar’s share may be higher still.

Subprime currency

The dollar’s place as a reserve currency always seems to be questioned when it falls. Weakness in 1977-79, 1985-88 and 1993-95 was each time met with predictions that governments were about to switch their reserves into another currency. A burst of high inflation, which undermined the dollar in the late 1970s, made that slide as serious as today’s scare is. Between 1978 and 1980 the Treasury sold $6.4 billion of “Carter bonds”, mostly denominated in Deutschmarks, to raise funds to defend the dollar. In January 1980 the gold price reached a record $835 (around $2,250 in today’s prices) as investors sought an alternative store of value. And when the dollar fell to ¥81 in 1995, many—including this newspaper—saw it as the beginning of the end of its reserve-currency status.

The dollar has weathered these storms. But now it faces a nasty squall that combines both cyclical and structural blasts. Its decline in the past five years has imposed a huge capital loss on foreign-exchange reserves. If this becomes too painful, central banks may be tempted to cut their losses and dump their dollars, causing a slump in the currency’s value. The lure of selling is made all the greater by the knowledge that other central banks are overloaded with dollars too. Those that get out first have more chance of saving their capital.

America’s thirst for overseas funding is another reason to fret. For years it has spent more than it earns, running up large, persistent current-account deficits. Last year the shortfall in America was a whopping 6% of GDP. Bridging that gap requires foreigners to buy dollar assets—bonds, stocks or property. But the more overseas debt that America runs up, the greater the risk that it will partly default on its obligations, either through currency weakness or inflation.

These vulnerabilities are not new but they are made worse by an economy that is turning sour. Losses on subprime mortgages have intensified the housing downturn in America and poisoned its credit markets. The threat of recession has prompted two interest-rate cuts, and more reductions are likely. Faltering growth and falling interest rates make for a weak currency, particularly when growth prospects elsewhere seem rosier. And the downgrades to credit-related securities once deemed top-notch have hurt the reputation of America’s capital markets.

America’s downturn poses other problems too. The oil-rich Gulf states are thinking of ditching their currency pegs with the greenback. These links have obliged them to buy dollars, so as to prevent their own currencies from rising. The dollar peg has made it hard to curb inflation, especially in fast-growing oil economies, whereas a less rigid exchange-rate regime—say, a peg with a basket of currencies—may allow a more flexible interest-rate policy. Such a regime would also crimp the demand for dollars at a time when confidence in the currency is fragile. All this may not bode well for the dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency.

However, even if this is an awkward time for the currency, it need not be a catastrophic one. The fear that the dollar could be swiftly supplanted as top dog is based on the idea that one currency will always have a near-monopoly: if everyone holds dollars chiefly because everyone else does, you could imagine how a falling share of global reserves might reach a point when central banks all suddenly switch to a new currency standard.

The dollar’s favoured position in international trade owes something to this kind of network effect. Global markets in commodities are priced and transacted almost exclusively in dollars, because it is convenient for buyers and sellers. But whatever Mr Ahmadinejad thinks, oil exporters would not get more income if commodities were priced in euros or pounds. The competing pressures of supply and demand set the oil price: the dollar is just an easy way of keeping score. The convention of quoting in dollars is often employed when the currency of one or more trading partners is not used. Once such a standard is set, there are costs to shifting to a new one. But the benefits to America of issuing the world’s favoured transaction currency are easily exaggerated. Advances in financial technology mean that a given volume of trade requires a much smaller dollar-float than in the past.

The confidence factor

The role for the dollar as an international means of exchange is entirely different from its role as a reserve currency. Reserves are held to buttress confidence in a country’s own currency, not as a float for global trading. As a backstop, reserves need to be easily convertible (so they can be used as an emergency source of liquidity) and a good store of value. The dollar, with its large and liquid capital markets, meets the first criterion even if it has failed the second—at least, recently.

Barry Eichengreen, a professor of economics at the University of California, Berkeley, argues that there is no reason why a single currency should dominate reserves as the dollar has. Before the era of the dollar standard, he points out, reserves were in a handful of currencies. On the eve of the first world war, when Britain was the greatest trading power, the pound’s share in official currency reserves was all but matched by the combined share of the French franc and German mark. After the war a three-way split was maintained, with the dollar replacing the mark.

If the dollar’s dominance is to end, two or more currencies are likely to share the crown. Those who take a grand sweep of history are backing China’s yuan as a big reserve currency of the future. The dollar’s immediate rival, however, is the euro. In several important respects—the euro area’s size, the depth of its capital markets and its share of world trade—it has the attributes of an ideal reserve currency (see table below). Unlike America, the euro area has the added attraction of a broadly balanced current account.

The euro has already made inroads into the dollar’s territory. At its launch in 1999, its constituent currencies—the mark, franc, lira, etc—accounted for less than a fifth of the world’s official reserves. Its share has since increased to around a quarter, even as total currency reserves have swollen. The euro area is less dependent on oil imports than America is and it sells more to oil exporters as well as to fast-growing economies such as China and Brazil.

The euro’s attractions may be somewhat superficially enhanced at the moment. It has risen sharply in value, flattered by cyclical forces that have favoured it over the dollar. But only a year ago Italy’s sluggish economy and fiscal problems inspired talk about a break up of the euro. Just five years ago the euro was considered irredeemably weak.

But although the near-term outlook may be favourable to the euro, its prospects in the medium-term may not be so bright. The euro’s appreciation is already causing strains within the currency zone. In the coming decades the euro zone’s workforce is set to age faster than America’s, which will hamper its economy and add to its fiscal pressures. There is also the question of how much trust investors will put in a currency with no central fiscal authority to stand behind it.

Since the title of reserve currency can be split, the dollar’s share in global currency reserves is probably too big—whatever happens to foreign-exchange rates. Many of the countries that have built large stocks of dollar assets by pegging their currencies to the greenback are now battling with inflation. Sticking with the peg would mean importing the policies of recession-threatened America and feeding inflation still more. Yet abandoning the peg only adds to the pressure on the dollar.

A compromise is to be weaned off the dollar, with a peg made up of a basket of rich-world currencies, including the greenback. This would give dollar-peggers more freedom over their monetary policy—they would no longer have to mimic the Fed slavishly—while allowing them gradually to slow their purchases of dollars.

Is a dollar rout avoidable? An optimist would say that central banks, having spurned the chance to diversify out of dollars when a euro could be bought for 86 cents, are unlikely to want to switch now when the price is close to $1.50. Against conventional benchmarks like purchasing-power parity, the euro looks dear against the dollar. So it could be a bad time to swap from one horse to another. To the extent that dollar-holders act like an informal cartel, then the biggest dollar-holders will set an example. Japan seems unlikely to start selling its huge dollar reserves—if anything it might intervene to prevent the dollar falling further against the yen. A crash might be averted if China holds fast too, because it recognises how self-defeating dumping dollars would be to such a large owner of American assets.

Yet a pessimist would counter that a revaluation of emerging-market currencies against the dollar could easily turn disorderly. Although economic logic may argue against selling dollars at a cyclical low point, central banks have sometimes been hopeless portfolio managers: witness their shift out of gold just as its price hit a low. Yes, the dollar looks cheap, but currencies often overshoot. So it would be foolish to say where its decline should stop.

Averting a crash

Despite the anxiety and gloom, some straws in the wind suggest that the dollar’s decline may soon slow. In the past few weeks it has regained ground against a handful of important currencies, including the pound and the Australian dollar. America’s trade balance is narrowing, despite the effects of expensive oil imports, suggesting that a weaker currency is already working to correct imbalances.

As a rule, central banks cannot intervene to determine exchange rates, but as Morgan Stanley’s Mr Jen suggests, some sort of official action has often preceded turning points in the world’s foreign-exchange markets. If he is right, then a change in rhetoric or even co-ordinated intervention may be the signal the markets need before they stop believing that the dollar is destined to fall further.

The Economist

Related Link:

Dollar slips, euro gains credibility as viable rival

 

Recent Comments


Powered by WP | Created by miloIIIIVII