Archive for the ‘Iraq War’ Category

Saddam’s Fear

Monday, July 6th, 2009

Saddam Hussein spoke to his captors about the reasons why he danced around weapons inspectors in the run up to the Iraq War. It further shows the shortsidedness of the Bush policy and its failing to understand how Iraq, sitting on the Sunni-Shia fault line, served as a buffer against a resurgent Iran.

Documents Show Iraqi Dictator’s Fears

By SCOTT SHANE

WASHINGTON — In a series of interrogations before his execution, Saddam Hussein told an F.B.I. agent that on the eve of the 2003 American invasion, Iraq was trapped between United Nations orders to demonstrate that it had disarmed and a fear that appearing too weak would invite attack from its powerful neighbor and foe, Iran. More

Crimes in the Sandbox

Tuesday, May 26th, 2009

You get the feeling this is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to Iraq. So much for loyalty to country.

Iraqi Sovereignty

Monday, December 15th, 2008

 

 

We finally received our flowers and candy.

 

Shoe insult against Bush resounds in Arab world

Demise of AQI in Iraq

Sunday, July 6th, 2008

Good news continues to flow from Iraq. The sweep through the last urban stronghold of Al Qaida in the country is almost finished as is the terrorist organization there. In the latest report, Al Qaida in Iraq (AQI) is  little more than a few armed bands hiding in rural areas. Their attacks are less frequent and have little impact. As temperatures in the region approached 106 degrees the war against the Sunni terrorist organization is cooling down. Last month the leader of AQI Abu Khalaf, a protégé of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was killed and the deterioration of the organization has followed.soldiers in mosul

The best news, however, is the fact there were no US combat deaths in Iraq this week. This is the first time that has occurred since the start of the war.

In the one issue Barrack Obama has failed to move on, Iraq, we are beginning to see a nuance of his campaign message to remove US troops as fast as possible. This is a welcome change. Iraq needs the time to initiate its reconstruction. McCain has an albatross of his own around his political neck. America doesn’t belong in Iraq for an extended occupation a la Germany or Japan following WW II. With Afghanistan deteriorating and the need to force the hand of Pakistan, we need to wrap up our stay in Iraq. As Obama nuances his stand on the Iraq War, McCain needs to do the same. But as we all know this election will not be about the Iraq War but it may be about what lies below the ground in Iraq, oil.

Channeling Cuba in Iraq

Monday, June 16th, 2008

History is circuitous. Go back a hundred and ten years and you will find some eerie correlations with modern events.  Most who know their history will tell you the explosion of the USS Maine in Havana Harbor was the cause of the Spanish-American War. To a large extend it was the cause. But ask what caused the ship to explode and the the story gets muddier. The press certainly played a role in stoking the flames of war. William Randolph Hearst is believed to have wired the artist Frederick Remington in Cuba with the line, “You supply the pictures and I’ll supply the war.” Stories of Spanish atrocities there were popular in the “yellow press” of the day. The Cuban revolutionaries were seen in America as later day patriots.

When the US military used the destruction of the USS Maine as a causus belli against Spain, our cause seemed to be just. Not only were we shaking off the remnants of European tyranny in the Western Hemisphere but we were freeing an oppressed people a few short miles from our shore. Cuba Libre! cuba The Spanish were easily routed from the last vestiges of their empire and their colonies became American spoils. The global political climate, however, did not involve altruism for altruism’s sake. Manifest destiny seemed to no longer be bound by the limits of seas and oceans. The Cubans (along with the Filipinos) soon realized that one colonizer had been replaced by another. Though tucked neatly in the Cuban Constitution like a thorn on a rose bush, the Platte Amendment set the stage for a long US commitment in Cuba, one in which the Cubans played a secondary role in ruling their own nation. The results of such heavy handedness are still being felt. A Fidel Castro would never had risen in an independent and democratic Cuba.

In recent weeks we have seen similar vestiges of century old polices reemerge. The Iraqi President Nuri Al-Maliki is currently negotiating a new security policy with the US over America’s long term commitment in Iraq. The current policy, as outlined within the UN, expires at the end of this year and the Iraqis are balking at the idea of an extended US presence in Iraq in its current form. One of the key sticking points is the number of bases that would be allowed to field US troops. Malaki wishes to scale down that number. Another issue is the extra-legality of US and mercenary forces in Iraq. Currently the members of the American military and their support forces are not bound by Iraqi legal jurisdictions. The Iraqis want to see a change in this policy. At odds, also, is the number of US combat troops that will be allowed to remain in Iraq and the free will of their commanders to initiate combat operations without consent of the Iraqi authorities. handshake

On one hand these negotiations are good things. It shows the Iraqis are beginning to exert their political will. On the other hand, the fact the Bush Administration is butting heads with them over these issues leads one to wonder what intentions does the US have for Iraq and what was the real reason why we invaded. There used to be the mantra, “When they stand up, we will stand down.” If the Iraqis are calling for the draw down of US bases and forces, isn’t that what we have hoped for all along? The birth of the new Iraq was so tumultuous. Let’s not botch the end game as well and leave the nation bitter like Cuba in the wake of the Spanish-American War. A strong political will by the Maliki government is a gift and it is time the Bush Administration accepts it.

Turning a Corner in iraq

Sunday, June 1st, 2008

 

As the Democratic race nears its end and the economy takes its rightful place on the front burner of the 2008 Presidential campaign the sights and sounds of Iraq have largely faded from public view. It is a shame because we are seeing dramatic events unfolding there. Violence in that war torn land is way down and Patraeus’ counterintelligence (COIN) strategy which began with the surge in late 2007 is bearing fruit. Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) exists only in small pockets and even those elements are finding life extremely difficult these days. For the most part AQI has overplayed their hand by murdering Iraqis in an effort to use fear to foment their grip on the nation. They are seen as enemies of the state by both Sunnis and Shias within Iraq.

The huge debacle perpetrated by L. Paul Bremmer at the onset of the occupation, the disbanding of the Iraq military, has largely been reversed iraqi Army Basraand we are seeing more and more Iraqi forces (IA) take the lead in securing areas of Iraq once the domain of either AQI (who have been forced out) or sectarian militias (who have been forced to either lay down their arms or melt away). The most dramatic example of the IA playing a singular role is in Basra, a city near both the Iranian border and along the Persian Gulf. Basra was "seized" by IA troops two months ago and has since secured the city.  At the onset of the war Basra had been "occupied" by British forces but they recently left Iraq. Even when the British troops resided in the city, their hands off approach allowed for the city to devolve into power struggles between a multitude of Shiite militias, all vying to see who could be the most Islamic. As a result the region turned into a Taliban style, culturally restrictive enclave. All of this turmoil occurred in Iraqis most oil rich sector.

The progress in Basra comes on the heals of significant improvements first in Sunni dominated Al-Anbar Province and then in Baghdad. Sadr City, a lower class Shia neighborhood has been cleared of active militias by both US forces and IA. 

The best news of all is that Iraqi President Nouri al-Maliki has vast public support. al maliki The true test of this will occur in 2009 as Iraq is set to hold general elections next year.

There is no doubt Iraq has a long way to go, especially in terms of repairing its infrastructure but the signs are promising. As I have said all along, failure in Iraq would be horrible for the Iraqis and send an abysmal message to those in the region. Patreaus continues to prove his mettle. If the casualty rates continue to decline, the Iraq War will indeed no longer be a significant campaign issue. For all Americans and Iraqis, this could be the best possible result.

Con-damned

Wednesday, May 28th, 2008

 

Details of former White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan’s new book are coming out and by all indications it offers a scathing recollection of his days in the White House.

mcclellan

 

 

 

 

 

His revelations about why Bush went to war in Iraq are especially telling:

 

In Iraq, McClellan added, Bush saw "his opportunity to create a legacy of greatness, "something McClellan said Bush has said he believes is only available to wartime presidents.

The president’s real motivation for the war, he said, was to transform the Middle East to ensure an enduring peace in the region. But the White House effort to sell the war as necessary due to the stated threat posed by Saddam Hussein was needed because "Bush and his advisers knew that the American people would almost certainly not support a war launched primarily for the ambitions purpose of transforming the Middle East," McClellan wrote.

 AJC.com

 

On Bush’s leadership skills he writes:

"It strikes me today as an indication of his lack of inquisitiveness and his detrimental resistance to reflection, something his advisers needed to compensate for better than they did."

Bush misled U.S. on Iraq, former aide says in new book

Scott McClellan’s ‘What Happened’ delivers tough criticism of president, advisers

By KEN HERMAN
Cox News Service
Published on: 05/27/08

WASHINGTON — In a book due out Monday, former White House press secretary Scott McClellan offers a blistering review of the administration and concludes that his longtime boss misled the nation into an unnecessary war in Iraq.

Read the Rest

Return on Wisdom

Monday, May 5th, 2008

 

 

 

Thomas Friedman has returned from sabbatical to enlighten us on the current issues of our times. Today he speaks about the US’ failures. He also gives a nod to Obama. I’m starting to believe Obama is the anti-Bush, and the anti-Bush is just fine by me.

 

 

Who Will Tell the People?

By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN

Traveling the country these past five months while writing a book, I’ve had my own opportunity to take the pulse, far from the campaign crowds. My own totally unscientific polling has left me feeling that if there is one overwhelming hunger in our country today it’s this: People want to do nation-building. They really do. But they want to do nation-building in America.

They are not only tired of nation-building in Iraq and in Afghanistan, with so little to show for it. They sense something deeper — that we’re just not that strong anymore. We’re borrowing money to shore up our banks from city-states called Dubai and Singapore. Our generals regularly tell us that Iran is subverting our efforts in Iraq, but they do nothing about it because we have no leverage — as long as our forces are pinned down in Baghdad and our economy is pinned to Middle East oil.

Our president’s latest energy initiative was to go to Saudi Arabia and beg King Abdullah to give us a little relief on gasoline prices. I guess there was some justice in that. When you, the president, after 9/11, tell the country to go shopping instead of buckling down to break our addiction to oil, it ends with you, the president, shopping the world for discount gasoline.

We are not as powerful as we used to be because over the past three decades, the Asian values of our parents’ generation — work hard, study, save, invest, live within your means — have given way to subprime values: “You can have the American dream — a house — with no money down and no payments for two years.”

Read the Rest

The Anti-Bush

Monday, April 14th, 2008

 

 

The fact that Obama traveled the world as a young man may not certify him as a presidential candidate but allows him to analyze the conditions of the globe in ways Bush was never capable of doing.

 

A Man at Home in the World

NEWSWEEK

 

He was just a college kid, vagabonding around the world. But Barack Obama says the weeks he spent traveling through Pakistan in 1981 shaped the views that he still holds today—and that he would bring into the White House. Obama remembers most vividly the desperation and hopelessness—"essentially a feudal life"—he witnessed in the countryside surrounding Karachi, a city that is today a hotbed of jihadist activity. At the tender age of 20, Obama suggested, he was already beginning to understand more about what ailed Muslim societies—what generated terrorism and fratricidal conflicts—than George W. Bush or John McCain do today. "Both as a consequence of living in Indonesia and traveling in Pakistan, having friends in college who were Muslim, I was very clear about the history of Shia-Sunni antagonism"—which is one reason why, as an Illinois state senator 21 years later, he opposed the war in Iraq, Obama told NEWSWEEK last week. "This notion that somehow we were going to be able to create a functioning democracy and reconcile century-old conflicts, I always thought was a bunch of happy talk from this administration."kenya

Obama’s taken a lot of hits over his alleged foreign-policy inexperience—most notoriously from fellow Democrat Hillary Clinton, who suggested in a TV ad last month that he was the wrong man to answer the phone at 3 a.m. during a crisis. But last week Obama signaled that he’d had enough of these attacks. Not only did he not lack experience, Obama cockily told a fund-raising crowd in San Francisco, but "foreign policy is the area where I am probably most confident that I know more and understand the world better than Senator Clinton or Senator McCain."

If Obama wins the nomination and faces McCain, this will be a critical test of his candidacy: can he change the terms of the debate so that the traditional measures of foreign-policy experience don’t apply? Because the kind of experience he talks about so confidently is not what one typically associates with a presidential résumé. It’s not Ike leading the Allied Armies into Europe; it’s not JFK saving his shipmates aboard PT-109; it’s not George H.W. Bush running the CIA and serving as veep for eight years. (Or, for that matter, John McCain flying combat missions and getting shot down in Vietnam.) Nor was Obama alluding to his mastery of the Moscow Treaty on nukes or the subtleties of Mideast peace talks—though many of his Senate colleagues are impressed with his growing expertise in those areas.

 

Instead, it is the kind of bottom-up experience that comes from growing up in the muddy lanes of Jakarta, in a plain concrete house at No. 16 Haji Ramli Street. There Obama played hide-and-seek in the local mosque, dueled with bamboo sticks and learned dirty words in Indonesian. Friends and teachers recall his being picked on for his height and dark skin, but say that even amid an alien culture he was a leader and a peacemaker in the schoolyard. He always wanted the job of organizing the other kids into a line before class, says Fermina Katarina Sinaga Suhanda, his third-grade teacher, who had to urge him to take turns. "He always wants to be No. 1, to be at the front. Psychologically, he wants to be in charge," she says.

It’s a long way from homeroom monitor to commander in chief, of course. But it was in Jakarta that Obama came to appreciate both the powerlessness of his native companions and the status that came from having a white American mother, Ann, who worked for the U.S. Embassy. "He was at an age when you first begin to see what’s going on," says Ben Rhodes, one of his speechwriters. "And what he saw was that America had something other people wanted. Here he is in a majority Muslim country, in a poor neighborhood. And … he has this tie to America that affords him an immediate opportunity that no one else has." Both Obama’s Kenyan father—who abandoned the family—and his Indonesian stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, were eager to penetrate that Western world. They never fully succeeded, and Obama knew it.

That experience, aides say, turned Obama into both someone who identifies with those less fortunate abroad—and a true-blue patriot. "He understands he’s gotten where he is based on the fact that we have a system that opens up opportunity to smart and talented people," says retired Air Force Gen. Merrill McPeak, a top Obama adviser. McPeak, Rhodes and others claim that Obama’s upbringing gives him deeper insight into how to win the "hearts and minds" so crucial to success in Iraq, and in the global struggle against Islamic extremism. "Obama’s experience living abroad gives him a sense of that grass-roots life, which is so important in shaping why a terrorist is a terrorist," says Tony Lake, Bill Clinton’s former national-security adviser, who now is a top Obama adviser.

Read the Rest

The Wolf’s Ears

Wednesday, April 9th, 2008

 

I like to compare the American involvement in Iraq to Thomas Jefferson’s take on slavery. The third president of the United States said of slavery:

“But as it is, we have the wolf by the ear, and we can neither hold him, nor safely let him go. “

As I listen to General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker testify on the Hill these past two days I can’t help but shake my head at the complexity of the war. Beyond the presidential candidate’s questions that are posed to frame their stances in regard to the Iraq War there are the responses by the witnesses that reveal just how much the dynamics of the war can change. They change in ways that depict improvement in challenges that existed months prior (such as Al-Qaeda in Iraq) but  new tentacles grow out of the beast that pose significant new dangers (i.e. Shia conflict in Baghdad and in the south) that result in the inability of our military to make significant draw downs. In many ways Iraq has become the money pit. You might recall that awful Tom Hanks movie. As the nation’s economy wades into recession we find ourselves with an albatross. If you listen to the testimony on Capital Hill you will get the feeling despite the surge, there really isn’t much changing in Iraq. The country is so dysfunctional that when one ill seems to be resolved, another ailment pops up. Perhaps unlike the outcome of letting go of Jefferson’s wolf, the Iraq wolf is more apt to bite itself than the American’s that are holding it. As Petraeus was grilled repeatedly on the question of when will US troops be able to leave, he really must answer when is the right time to let go of the wolf’s ears?